How the Geoengineering Scam began by turning Geophysical Warfare into “Protection of Environment”!


  1. Satellites
  2. LBJ & JFK about ClimateControl
  3. Fraud-Wording with LBJ as President
  4. Climate priests of Club of Rome
  5. Other sources


1. ClimateControl Satellites

Satellites are a core infrastructure element of  Climate Geoengineering. They are required for long term observation and modification of the global weather system. The huge data collected by them needs to be stored, processed, analyzed and used for global weather modification with orbital, in air and on surface radar systems, plus the chlorification of the ozone layer, injection fine dust layers into the troposphere and lifting and steering of water by waterspout and storm forming vehicles.

So it is important to know the various satellite systems of the USA and other countries. The reader should extended this list with the systems of other important entities like China, India, Europe and Russia.

A brief history of weather satellites
By Anusuya Datta – 11/19/2016

The idea of cameras in space to observe the earth’s climate was being developed as early as 1946. This was due to sparse data observation coverage and the expense of using cloud cameras on rockets. By 1958, the early prototypes for TIROS and Vanguard (developed by the Army Signal Corps) were created.

The Nimbus series were seven satellites launched over a 14 years from 1964 to 1978 and revolutionized weather forecasting by providing some of the first consistent global measurements of the earth. Over 20 years since Nimbus-1 was launched, it was the primary research and development platform for satellite remote-sensing of the earth in the US. NASA transferred the technology tested and refined by the Nimbus missions to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) later.

The ESSA or Environmental Science Services Administration Satellite Program was initiated as an extension of the TIROS Program. ESSA-1 was launched on 3 February 1966 and operated normally until 6 October 1966 when its camera system failed. It was fully deactivated on 8 May 1967. For four years, ESSA satellites transmitted thousands of images back to earth, enabling ground stations to predict weather patterns, including hurricanes.

Polar-orbiting operational environmental satellites or POES stretch back to 1978 when the first modern weather satellite TIROS-N was launched. TIROS-N was operated for 868 days until deactivated by NOAA on February 27, 1981. Polar orbiting satellites such as QuikScat and TRMM began to relay wind information near the ocean’s surface starting in the late 1970s, with microwave imagery which resembled radar displays thus improving the diagnoses of cyclones and their locations during the 2000s and 2010s.

The geostationary satellites followed beginning with the Applications Technology Satellite or ATS program in the late 1960s. The overall objective was to investigate and flight-test technological developments common to a number of satellite applications. The ATS series had a total of six satellites carrying out a variety of communications, meteorology, and scientific experiments, in addition to providing a platform for evaluating three different kinds of spacecraft stabilization systems.

The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) series followed immediately after the SMS program in the 1970s. In fact SMS-3 went operational as GOES-1 on October 16, 1975.

The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program or DMSP is an originally classified mission revealed in March 1973. It is managed by the Air Force Space Command with on-orbit operations provided by the NOAA. It monitors meteorological, oceanographic, and solar-terrestrial physics for the United States Department of Defense. They provide cloud cover imagery from polar orbits that are sun-synchronous at nominal altitude of 450 nautical miles (830 km). DMSP can detect the best of all-weather vehicles with its ability to detect objects almost as ‘small’ as a huge oil tanker. Among all the weather satellites in orbit, only DMSP can “see” at night in the visual because of its low moonlight sensor.


2. LBJ & JFK about ClimateControl

After the classified release of the “CIA Memorandum on Climate Control” in the year 1960, vice president Lyndon B. Johnson and president John F. Kennedy of the USA spoke about climate control to some closed and public audiences.

LBJ is more direct! JFK has to talk more diplomatically addressing foreign attendees.

JFK Forecasts Weather Control at 1961 UN General Assembly

LBJ: “… the development of weather satellite, that will permit man to determine the worlds cloud layer and ultimately to control the weather and he who controls the weather, controls the world.”

Lyndon Johnson control the weather, to control the world ! 1962

JFK: “The scientific possibility of a world weather watch requires the attention of the World Meteorological Organization. The exploration of the oceans leads to the establishment of an Intergovernmental Oceanography Commission.

… Scientists have studied the atmosphere for many, but its problems continue to defy us.

The reasons for our limited progress are obvious. Weather cannot be easily reproduced and observed in the laboratory. It mus therefore be studied in all its violence or ever it has its way. Here is an oceanography, new scientific tools have become available, with modern computers, rockets and satellites. The time is right to harness a variety of disciplines for a concerted attack. And even more than oceanography, the atmospheric sciences require worldwide observation, enhanced international cooperation.

Some of our most successful efforts have involved the study of atmosphere. We all know that the World Meteorological Organization has been effective in this field. It is now developing a worldwide weather system, to which the nations of the world over can make their contribution. Such cooperative undertakings can challenge the worlds best efforts for decades to come. Fourth, I will mention a problem which I know greatly concerned many of you. That is our responsibility to control the effects of our own scientific experiments. For a science investigates the natural environment, it also modifies it. And that modification may have incalculable consequences for evil as well as for good. In the past the problem of conservation has been mainly the problem of human waste of natural resources, of their destruction, but science has the power for the first time in history now, to undertake experiments with premeditation which can irreversibly alter our biological and physical environment on a global scale.

… We must for example balance the gains of weather modification against the hazards of protracted drought or storm. The government has the clear responsibility to weigh the importance of large scale experiments to the advance of knowledge or the national security against the possibility of adverse and destructive effects. The scientific community must assist the government and arriving at rational judgements and interpreting these issues to the public .

1963 Weather Modification Speech President John F Kennedy


3. Fraud-Wording with LBJ as President

After the writing of the CIA-Memorandung in 1960, the  killing of JFK and beginning of the presidency of LBJ in 1963, the open or more diplomatic rhetoric is replaced by a fraud-wording.

1965, in the report released by the  “Environmental Pollution Panel, President’s Science Advisory Committee” of the White House, instead of “controlling the weather” the wording is distracted to “RESTORING the QUALITY of our ENVIRONMENT“. The concern about pollution is used to frame the CO2 as a pollutant!

The document deserves a specific analysis.  It is putting the scientific knowledge and reality upside down, but the fraud is kept in a “scientific” manner, to give it credibility. All the men which worked on this paper or at least allowed their names to be used, must have been deadly idiots or opportunist traitors without honor and backbone. In the history of mankind, they will be remembered as henchmen of the biggest criminal implementation.

We find there main elements of the climate fraud, which are repeated every day and night on all channels of imperial media since the release of this document.

  • Environmental pollution as a by-product of man’s actions 
  • Effects of an increase in atmospheric CO2 
  • Burning of fossil fuels “measurably” increases atmospheric CO2 
  • Fossil fuel combustion produces 100x the rate metallic carbonates can maintain current levels of atmospheric CO2 
  • Explanation of the greenhouse effect 
  • The greenhouse effect is not new science – hypothesized as early as 1899 
  • CO2 content of the atmosphere increased by 1.36% in 5 years 
  • Fossil fuel combustion the only producer of new CO2 – 7% higher than a century ago 
  • 150 years from now, with present consumption, an expected 170% increase in atmospheric CO2 
  • The ocean can only absorb a small portion of CO2 and it’s a slow process 
  • By 2000, a 25% increase in atmospheric CO2 compared to the 19th century 
  • 25% increase in atmospheric CO2 could increase average temp. by .6 to 4 degrees celsius 
  • Just 400 years until the Antarctic ice cap is melted 
  • 1960s atmospheric warming was a global phenomenon – average rise of .5 degrees celsius 
  • 25% increase in atmospheric CO2 will cause changes in climate and properties in the stratosphere 
  • Potential solution – change the reflectivity of the ocean for an estimated $500 million a year

Here are some quotes from there:

Pollution now is one of the most pervasive problems of our society. With our numbers increasing, and with our increasing urbanization and industrialization, the flow of pollutants to our air, soils and waters is increasing. This increase is so rapid that our present efforts in managing pollution are barely enough to stay even, surely not enough to make the improvements that are needed.

The present rate of production of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion is about a hundred times the average rate of release of calcium and magnesium from the weathering of silicate rocks. As long as this ratio holds, precipitation of metallic carbonates will be unable to maintain an unchanging content of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Within a few short centuries, we are returning to the air a significant part of the carbon that was slowly extracted by plants and buried in the sediments during half a billion years.

Not all of this added carbon dioxide will remain in the air. Part of it. will become dissolved in the ocean, and part will be taken up by the biosphere, chiefly ill trees and other terrestrial plants, and in the dead plant litter called humus. The part that remains in the atmosphere may have significant effect on climate: carbon dioxide is nearly transparent to visible light, but It is a strong absorber and back radiator of infrared radiation, particularly in the wave lengths from 12 to 18 microns consequently, an increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide could act much like the glass in a greenhouse, to raise the temperature of the lower air. [Water vapor also absorbs infrared radiation, both in the range of the CO2 band centered at 15 microns, and at wave lengths near 6.3 microns. With the average concentration of water vapor in the lower air at mid latitudes, the effect of carbon dioxide absorption is reduced to about half that which would exist in an absolutely dry atmosphere. (Möller, 1963.) Ozone, which is an important constituent of the upper air, also absorbs some infrared at wave lengths around 9.6 microns, but its principal effect on air temperature is due to its absorption of ultraviolet and visible sunlight.].” 

“The possibility of climatic change resulting from changes in the quantity of atmospheric carbon dioxide was proposed independently by the American geologist, T. C. Chamberlain (1899) and the Swedish chemist, S. Arrhenius (1903), at the beginning of this century. Since their time, many scientists have dealt with one or another aspect of this question, but until very recently there was little quantitative information about what has actually happened. Even today, we cannot make a useful prediction concerning the magnitude or nature of the possible climatic effects. But we are able to say a good deal more than formerly about the change in the quantity of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and about the partition of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion among the atmosphere, the ocean, and the biosphere.

Through his worldwide industrial civilization, Man is unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment. Within a few generations he is burning the fossil fuels that slowly accumulated in the earth over the past 500 million years

By the year 2000 the increase in CO2 will be close to 25%. This may be sufficient to produce measurable and perhaps marked changes in climate. and will almost certainly cause significant changes in the temperature and other properties of the stratosphere.  At present it is impossible to predict these effects quantitatively, but recent advances in mathematical modelling of the atmosphere, using large computers may allow useful predictions within the next 2 or 3 years.

“The climate changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings.”

According to Manabe and Strickler (1964) the absorption and reradiation of infrared by high cirrus clouds (above five miles) tends to heat the atmosphere near the earth’s surface. Under some circum-

stances, injection of condensation or freezing nuclei will cause cirrus clouds to form at high altitudes. This potential method of bringing about climatic changes needs to be investigated as a possible tool for modifying atmospheric circulation in ways which might counteract the effects of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide.


4. Climate priests of Club of Rome

As climate geoengineering can only be conducted by global climate control, the fraud had to be brought to the global audience. For that a fake-moralist conference was organized in Italy. The organization was given the name of the location.

I will quote from, the Source of all the text below!

The Club Of Rome
Altogether This is AGENDA 21
By Jim Kiran, 3-22-14

The origins of environmental investment as we see it began in 1968, when the Club of Rome was founded.

The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think-tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this (Vatican correlated) think tank was to formulate a crisis ‘to unite the world’ and condition us to the idea of global solutions for local problems. In a document called ‘The 1st Global Revolution, authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on Pg. 104 & 105 it stated: In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came us with the idea that pollution. The threat of global-warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fill the bill.

All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global-response. That’s the origin of “Global-Warming” Ladies & Gentlemen.

In 1992 a former president of the United States, George Bush Sr. said: “Effective Execution of Agenda 21 will require profound reorientation of human society: Unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision-making, at every level.

Cutting thru the Code I want everyone to consider what the words “profound-reorientation of all human society” and “Unprecedented ­redeployment of human and financial resources” actually means.

In 1992 Morris Strong, Secretary General of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent class involve high intake consumption of large amounts of frozen convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning and suburban housing ­ and are not sustainable.

Put those statements together with previous ones and it must become clear that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives

  • How we eat, 
  • what we eat, 
  • how much we eat, 
  • how we move around, 
  • food production and 
  • where we even live.

Jay Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on sustainable Development said: “Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy fixated groups and individuals in our society.”

“This segment of our society who fear one world government and UN invasion through which our individual freedoms will be stripped away, would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the conspiracy by undertaking Agenda 21, so we will call our process something else. We will call it ‘comprehensive planning’ or growth management or ‘smart growth’. We ended up with “Sustainable Development”. This was embraced completely by the USSA & California

With environmentalism the new one world religion and out of this summit came Agenda 21. Ted Turner, also a member of Club of Rome was quoted in 1996 as saying: “The total population of 250 to 300 million people is ideal. That means a reduction of 95% from present levels, which would be even more ideal. Anyone who abhors the China one-child policy is simply a dumb-dumb.” In 1998 the Baltimore Sun reported on July 7, Most of Ted Turner’s first donation to the UN of 22 million went to programs that seek to stall population. Another goal of the depopulation process is that the upcoming generation will be their sterilization, to save mother earth.”


5. Other sources

Now some other, current sources!

California Lawmakers Move to Toughen Climate-Change Law

The cap-and-trade program is particularly important to Mr. Brown, as profits help fund the state’s planned bullet train, among other goals of the state’s Democrats. But business groups say the program, and the expanded climate-change law, is burdensome for business.

The California Chamber of Commerce is suing the state, arguing the carbon permit auctions that are part of the cap-and-trade program amount to an illegal tax on business.

According to observation and information e.g. from Rosalind Peterson,

  • the project began in USA at the end of 1980s,
  • more evidently in the 1990s,
  • huge roll out since 1996 and
  • inclusion of more European countries at least since 2002,

when extreme weather events started in Germany and other Central European countries.

Rosalind Peter says that NASA began to with the propaganda about the “normality” of “persistent trail” with the project roll out.

A many times falsified speculation of a pseudo scientist was used as a fake scientific foundation for the lies about CO2.

The Shattered Greenhouse: How Simple Physics Demolishes the “Greenhouse Effect”.

Arrhenius’ first error was to assume that greenhouses and hotboxes work as a radiation trap. Fourier explained quite clearly that such structures simply prevent the replenishment of the air inside, allowing it to reach much higher temperatures than are possible in circulating air (Fourier, 1824, translated by Burgess, 1837, p. 12; Fourier, 1827, p. 586). Yet, as we have seen in the previous quotation of Arrhenius, this fundamental misunderstanding of greenhouses is attributed by Arrhenius to Fourier.

Real Climate Science:
Peter L. Ward:
Gary Novak:
Timothy Casey:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.